Chrome 20.7x as fast as Firefox on Linux
by Stephen Fluin 2009.06.06I'm a big fan of choice in the open source world. Several weeks ago I tried out the Chromium nightlies for Linux and found it to be great but incomplete (no flash, some rendering errors). Yesterday a development release of Chrome was finally released. I ran both Firefox and Chrome through the SunSpider Javascript Benchmark, with the following results:
Test Results
TEST COMPARISON FROM TO DETAILS ============================================================================= ** TOTAL **: 20.7x as fast 15319.2ms +/- 3.8% 740.0ms +/- 1.3% significant ============================================================================= 3d: 4.76x as fast 513.6ms +/- 2.0% 108.0ms +/- 3.3% significant cube: 5.95x as fast 190.4ms +/- 3.0% 32.0ms +/- 0.0% significant morph: 3.50x as fast 156.8ms +/- 4.7% 44.8ms +/- 5.0% significant raytrace: 5.33x as fast 166.4ms +/- 2.7% 31.2ms +/- 13.3% significant access: 12.3x as fast 736.8ms +/- 4.0% 60.0ms +/- 5.9% significant binary-trees: 27.0x as fast 194.4ms +/- 3.9% 7.2ms +/- 30.9% significant fannkuch: 13.9x as fast 267.2ms +/- 0.8% 19.2ms +/- 11.6% significant nbody: 6.60x as fast 158.4ms +/- 5.7% 24.0ms +/- 14.7% significant nsieve: 12.2x as fast 116.8ms +/- 19.8% 9.6ms +/- 28.4% significant bitops: 10.7x as fast 532.0ms +/- 1.7% 49.6ms +/- 9.0% significant 3bit-bits-in-byte: 32.2x as fast 128.8ms +/- 3.2% 4.0ms +/- 0.0% significant bits-in-byte: 21.9x as fast 140.0ms +/- 0.0% 6.4ms +/- 42.6% significant bitwise-and: 5.11x as fast 110.4ms +/- 4.0% 21.6ms +/- 12.6% significant nsieve-bits: 8.68x as fast 152.8ms +/- 2.7% 17.6ms +/- 15.5% significant controlflow: 54.7x as fast 131.2ms +/- 3.2% 2.4ms +/- 113.5% significant recursive: 54.7x as fast 131.2ms +/- 3.2% 2.4ms +/- 113.5% significant crypto: 8.93x as fast 385.6ms +/- 1.5% 43.2ms +/- 5.1% significant aes: 8.43x as fast 141.6ms +/- 4.0% 16.8ms +/- 13.2% significant md5: 7.90x as fast 126.4ms +/- 3.5% 16.0ms +/- 0.0% significant sha1: 11.3x as fast 117.6ms +/- 2.3% 10.4ms +/- 26.2% significant date: 87.3x as fast 9704.0ms +/- 8.2% 111.2ms +/- 3.7% significant format-tofte: 165.2x as fast 9516.0ms +/- 8.3% 57.6ms +/- 4.7% significant format-xparb: 3.51x as fast 188.0ms +/- 4.9% 53.6ms +/- 8.3% significant math: 5.98x as fast 473.6ms +/- 1.9% 79.2ms +/- 6.9% significant cordic: 7.50x as fast 192.0ms +/- 1.8% 25.6ms +/- 10.6% significant partial-sums: 3.62x as fast 144.8ms +/- 6.6% 40.0ms +/- 0.0% significant spectral-norm: 10.1x as fast 136.8ms +/- 3.0% 13.6ms +/- 20.0% significant regexp: 14.1x as fast 236.8ms +/- 10.4% 16.8ms +/- 13.2% significant dna: 14.1x as fast 236.8ms +/- 10.4% 16.8ms +/- 13.2% significant string: 9.66x as fast 2605.6ms +/- 14.2% 269.6ms +/- 1.0% significant base64: 5.61x as fast 161.6ms +/- 14.5% 28.8ms +/- 7.7% significant fasta: 8.38x as fast 348.8ms +/- 1.2% 41.6ms +/- 6.5% significant tagcloud: 30.9x as fast 1457.6ms +/- 4.4% 47.2ms +/- 4.7% significant unpack-code: 5.21x as fast 454.4ms +/- 62.6% 87.2ms +/- 2.6% significant validate-input: 2.83x as fast 183.2ms +/- 7.5% 64.8ms +/- 3.4% significant
Conclusion
Chrome/Chromium is much faster, sleeker, sexier, but lacks flash and the ability to use extensions. If Chrome/Chromium supported these two items today, I would switch and never look back.
permalink